Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Rating Servers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Spamming the boards! christmaspwns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Replies
    127
    Country
    Fiji
    Xfire
    christmaspwns
    Clan
    Pro*
    It's not about if it's easier or not. It's just bullshit that FA#2 is the only server you HAVE to play to get on top. (and I'm not talking about "whoring", but fragging)

  2. #2
    Spamming the boards! testforecho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Replies
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by christmaspwns View Post
    It's not about if it's easier or not. It's just bullshit that FA#2 is the only server you HAVE to play to get on top. (and I'm not talking about "whoring", but fragging)
    It's about the way the system works, some flaws are inevitable, like:
    - Players are rated by name (a pro with a new name has a low rating, and is regarded as a noob). (I don't know how they deal with it, for example if there is an initial period when the rate moves faster, and cannot influence other player's rating)
    - Some players play only in some servers, and there isn't enough 'sharing' of players to adjust their relative scores. A server with only pros in it (who never play elsewhere) will never get them a high rating, since they are 'among equals', and regarded as 'average'. You need 'noobs' there too, to get a high score.
    - Servers with many players can assure you that you don't have many of them with a 'wrong' rating (that doesn't match their real skill)

    Add to this things like maps, server settings, etc. and eventually everyone will figure out the servers where you have to play to get score, and that will probably shift things even further in that direction.

Posting Permissions