[ SOLVED] Alternative cheatprotection?

[HK_Delirium]

Hi!

On trackbase, I've seen some servers which are using an "alternative cheatprotection", like the F|A servers (http://et.trackbase.net/index.php?mod=serverinfo&idx=6 for example).
What are the cheatprotection softwares recognized by Trackbase?

[Paul]

Hi!

On trackbase, I've seen some servers which are using an "alternative cheatprotection", like the F|A servers (http://et.trackbase.net/index.php?mod=serverinfo&idx=6 for example).
What are the cheatprotection softwares recognized by Trackbase?

Currently TB only recognizes Punkbuster (PB) and Speedlink anti-cheat (SLAC)... F|A is using some custom anti-cheat system while they are having punkbuster problems. Therefor, for F|A #2 there has been set an 'alternative cheatprotection'

Hope this informs,

Paul

[HK_Delirium]

Thanks for the answer Paul .

[R3ap4r]

So, the servers using the NQ mod 1.2.9 will have the same designation i suppose?

1.2.9 has an built in anti-cheat protection, as some servers have problems with PB aswell.

[tOrM]

nah is more like, FA servers have a LOT of admins very trustable ppl who go against cheaters, dont think the NQ built in protection will be recognized as anti cheat , unless it proves it can detect some hacks/cheats , etc.

[Dragonji]

Hello mates,

I'm really disappointed because of one issue. How is it possible two =F|A= servers are ranked when there are no cheatprotection (I mean PB is disabled)? Servers have status Alternative cheatprotection. In fact there can play cheaters and their sessions will be ranked. Isn't it unfair to the other servers where PB is disabled? IMO it is...

We all know the most of servers are PB-protected only becouse of trackers...

[Paul]

Hello mates,

I'm really disappointed because of one issue. How is it possible two =F|A= servers are ranked when there are no cheatprotection (I mean PB is disabled)? Servers have status Alternative cheatprotection. In fact there can play cheaters and their sessions will be ranked. Isn't it unfair to the other servers where PB is disabled? IMO it is...

We all know the most of servers are PB-protected only becouse of trackers...

Point is never-ever 1 cheater succeeded in hacking a full round on F|A because there are just continouly admins online
If other servers can provide the same, sure it'll work the same.

[R3ap4r]

Hello mates,

I'm really disappointed because of one issue. How is it possible two =F|A= servers are ranked when there are no cheatprotection (I mean PB is disabled)? Servers have status Alternative cheatprotection. In fact there can play cheaters and their sessions will be ranked. Isn't it unfair to the other servers where PB is disabled? IMO it is...

We all know the most of servers are PB-protected only becouse of trackers...

So, if i can get a server running, with a few people that have nothing to do in real life,
except, banning/kicking people that THEY think are cheating is a valid reason for being included into the stats overall?

Jeeses, this seems, no it is favourtisme towards a clan/server.

Untill otherwise, no pB, no ranking.

If God tells me that one particular server has the right, (and i don't care how much admins are online)
in this case FA servers, what reason or proof u have as site admin that THEY are above anyone else?
Furthermore, who are u to judge that their servers are included and the rest excluded from the ranking?

Otherwise, get a ranking, difference between Jmod, NQ, ETPRO.

[daredevil]

So, the servers using the NQ mod 1.2.9 will have the same designation i suppose?

1.2.9 has an built in anti-cheat protection, as some servers have problems with PB aswell.

@ NQ built in anti cheat protection. No more comments.

http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/4373/nqfyi.png

So, if i can get a server running, with a few people that have nothing to do in real life,
except, banning/kicking people that THEY think are cheating is a valid reason for being included into the stats overall?

Jeeses, this seems, no it is favourtisme towards a clan/server.

Untill otherwise, no pB, no ranking.

If God tells me that one particular server has the right, (and i don't care how much admins are online)
in this case FA servers, what reason or proof u have as site admin that THEY are above anyone else?
Furthermore, who are u to judge that their servers are included and the rest excluded from the ranking?

Otherwise, get a ranking, difference between Jmod, NQ, ETPRO.

Paul, clearly said, if he thinks another clan can shows they are actively banning cheaters, he would do same for other clans also. So, I am not sure where he is doing favoritism to few or many clans.

I would suggest, servers streaming to PBBans should be only ranked.

Any server not streaming to PBBans, shouldn't be ranked.
http://www.pbbans.com/master-stream-index.html

Otherwise, get a ranking, difference between NON streaming servers and Streaming servers.

[Le_Furet]

It's very good to add GGC Straming, PBBAN Streaming and GameViolation Streaming like PunkBuster and SLAC

For view server is streaming on GGC : http://www.ggc-stream.com/search/server/wwo

PS : GV is off ATM I think ...

Thanks